User talk:Sophie Wilder

Welcome to WikiIndex! We hope you will contribute much and well. You will probably want to read the help pages. Again, welcome and have fun! Elassint 4 March 2014 00:08, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Pedophile
There is a pedophile named User:Leucosticte at work on this wiki and he is shamelessly promoting his worldview and vocabulary. If you want I can give you assistance, I could reverse every edit he makes, back to your edit and I can use TOR to do that. --5.199.130.188 17:45, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. We need to stop this person. Sophie Wilder (talk) 18:11, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yup and since I am Danish, I could try altering the page when the fellows asleep. --194.132.32.42 20:38, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * So, you guys (assuming you actually are two separate people) are going to openly form a tag team to disrupt the wiki, and no one will intervene to stop you, because they don't want to seem like they're sympathetic to those who support a point of view that's always getting trashed in yellow journalism outlets such as Fox News, The Daily Mail, etc.? Sounds typical. If it were any other issue involved, your account probably would have been blocked already as a vandalism-only account. This kind of behavior by the anon is the reason people install mw:Extension:TorBlock, by the way.


 * I see some of the same dynamics unfolding here that happened with atheism. In that debate, atheists initially sought to not only be respectful to theists, but also go out of their way to avoid arguments, terminology, etc. that might offend them. When they found it didn't pay off, and that the theists did not reciprocate by giving them the same respect, the arose. People like, , , , , , , and  showed up to combat theism more fiercely.


 * It does no good to try to appease certain kinds of people, because they always want more. If people cave in to you on this issue, you'll be back later, behaving the same way, and trying to bully people into acceding to your demands on some other issue. So it would be best to deal with you with a firm hand now.


 * People call the slippery slope concept a fallacy; it's not. Your side tries to use controversial topics as wedge issues to open the door to more tyranny. An example would be this piece, stating that ", and  are all banned. Other countries merely go one step further by banning speech intended to intimidate vulnerable groups." According to that writer, "intimidation" means speech that leads people "to question whether their dignity and social status is secure." This could include "[t]he rape culture that permeates Facebook, Twitter and the public dialogue". So we see that the logic behind the ban on child porn distribution is being used to justify much more sweeping restrictions on speech.


 * The target of the attack is not just child sexual liberation, but child liberation in general, and ultimately liberalism as a whole. This is because a consistent liberal philosophy must include child liberation, and a consistent child liberationist philosophy must include child sexual liberation. To make any compromise is to accept into one's ideology a contradiction, which opponents can then exploit to bring down the whole structure. But there is nothing for ultraliberals to be ashamed of, as long as they stay true to their beliefs; their cause is just and noble.


 * Nor do liberals resort to the kind of censorship that your side uses. If you had strong arguments, you would not need to act as you do; you could win in a debate. The fact that you don't bother to try, but instead try to silence your opponents by any means possible, shows how weak you know your arguments to be.


 * Maybe people will cave in to you this time. But the New Child Liberationism will eventually arise, and prevail just as the New Atheism is beginning to. It's only a matter of time before people get fed up and quit letting you win by default. Leucosticte (talk) 21:16, 5 March 2014 (UTC)


 * You are evil, either kill yourself or find a psychiatrist. --77.244.254.227 00:19, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Warning
If you keep on about people being evil or being coward, I'll be forced to do some blocks. --YiFei | talk 12:20, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Shoot the messenger much? Sophie Wilder (talk) 19:14, 7 March 2014 (UTC)